Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Question of the Day

Why is word getting out only now about Tim Russert's refusing to testify before a Grand Jury, which testimony would serve to further incriminate the executive branch, and why does The New York Times want his papers? More to the point, what is going on in a country where the house majority leader drops out for consorting with corrupt lobbyists, esteemed members of the press, and newspapers, are guilty until proven innocent?